My post last week on offshore wind drew good discussion points on wind power, as well as folks skeptical of the whole industry. But wind power cannot be brushed aside as a treehugger’s fantasy. From coast to coast, wind power is a reality: Farmers own their own turbines, school districts power their facilities with them, or landowners lease their property to wind developers and collect royalty payments. I know of a hog farmer who is now a full time wind farmer, and higher education institutions that offer wind turbine maintenance certification. Clearly, wind power is here to stay.
But there are still misunderstandings and legitimate opportunities surrounding wind power, so here are some issues swirling around the world’s fastest growing energy source.
Cost: The cost of wind power continues to plummet, and it’s now on par with traditional energy sources. In fact, there are several cases where customers who originally paid a premium for wind power on their electric bill ended up with lower bills than their neighbors who relied solely on fuels like natural gas. While the cost of natural gas is volatile, the fuel for wind power is always free.
Wildlife: Modern wind turbines are not massacring birds. The Audubon Society endorses wind power, and a study by Western EcoSystems Technology found that cats kill more birds annually than wind turbines. The problems of the Altamont Pass wind farm in California – which was constructed in the 1980s on a migratory path for raptors – are often cited as proof that turbines in general are dangerous for birds. But with more modern siting techniques and technology (such as blades that revolve more slowly so birds can spot them), there is rarely a problem with bird deaths.
Storage and reliability: A commercialized technology that allows for wind power storage would be a revolutionary advancement (there are companies working on it). But I’m not worried about shivering in the dark because we’re not moving to 100 percent wind power tomorrow. The U.S. is not even close to the point at which storage should hold us back from wind. Instead, we should be working towards getting as much wind onto the grid as it can reasonably handle as fast as possible. Nationally, we get less than 1 percent of our electricity from wind, while some European countries are getting 20 percent from it and without any storage. According to the American Wind Energy Association, a flexible, diverse energy system that includes natural gas and renewables like hydropower can provide the “storage” or backup reliability. In fact, Xcel Energy, one of the largest utilities in the nation, has proposed more wind and hydropower to accommodate the growing need for baseload generation. A spokeswoman from Xcel explained, “[The] package was the best way – from an environmental, economic and reliability standpoint – to meet the remaining future needs of our electricity customers in the Upper Midwest.”
Furthermore, a study prepared for the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission found that wind power can reliably contribute up to 25 percent of the Midwest’s electricity with minimal cost if supported with good regulatory policies and modern transmission lines.
Wind power is here to stay, and as even more companies and individuals take advantage of it, the rest of the country will feel the impact: Stronger rural economies, less dependence on fossil fuels, cleaner air and water, and cuts to our global warming pollution.
For more information, check out the Green Life Guide.
American Wind Energy Association
Audubon Society
Earth Policy Institute
Midwest Wind Integration Study (2006)
United States Forest Service
Xcel Energy