Insurers Responding to Global Warming
Findings from a new report examining insurance companies’ responses to climate change were released at the International Association of Insurance Supervisors last week. The study found that an increasing number of companies are implementing initiatives to reduce the risk of climate change’s impacts and reduce the emissions that cause the problem.
"From Risk to Opportunity 2007: Insurer Responses to Climate Change" was commissioned by Ceres, a U.S. group of investors and clean energy supporters that also directs the Investor Network on Climate Risk, which manages more than $4 trillion in assets. Mindy S. Lubber, President of Ceres, explained the report’s findings:
Insurers are beginning to respond to global warming – and not just by withdrawing from coastal markets with high financial exposure. We’re seeing a rapid proliferation of products that will reduce climate-related financial losses, as well as the pollution causing global warming. Yet, insurer responses to date are not nearly sufficient given the scale of the challenge. We need more insurers, especially U.S. insurers, to step up.
Indeed, Europe’s largest insurer, Allianz, said that climate change may increase insured losses from extreme events in an average year by 37 percent within a decade. Karolinska medical university in Sweden predicts cardiovascular health problems to rise along with global temperatures.
Some specific initiatives offered by companies around the globe include:
- Green building credits
- Drought protection
- Incentives for investing in renewable energy (London-based Willis Holdings will cover potential underproduction of wind power)
- Clean transportation (The Japanese company Sompo gives premium discounts to policyholders who drive low-emitting cars)
All in all, the report found 422 examples from 190 insurers, reinsurers, brokers, and insurance organizations from 26 nations. That’s more than double the number of products found in a similar report barely over a year ago. I was surprised to learn that forty percent of the initiatives are from U.S. companies, although not surprisingly only a small minority of companies overall are exploring how climate change may affect business or are offering products to mitigate it.
With billions of dollars lost this year from unprecedented flooding and windstorms in Europe and wildfires in the U.S., some are nervous that climate change threatens the entire industry’s long-term viability. While the products from a handful of companies certainly won’t slow the consequences on their own, they must multiply to be part of the global solution that includes private sector involvement, government leadership, and consumer response.


October 29th, 2007 at 12:55 pm
“Karolinska medical university in Sweden predicts cardiovascular health problems to rise along with global temperatures.”
How so? What backs up such a statement? I thought that maybe we’d see an increase in drownings from the (predictions of) rapidly rising sea levels. Maybe all that swimming will give the Swedes heart-attacks before actually inhaling any water. Will the future insurance policies exclude swimming-induced cardiac arrests from coverage? More importantly, how will HillaryCare handle all of global warming’s health issues? Surely taxing the wealthy out of their McMansions and into the yurts can’t fix problems of such a large magnitude.
“With billions of dollars lost this year from…wildfires in the U.S.” maybe we should be asking who is setting those fires. Some say its al Qaeda, however, other terrorist organizations have a proven track record in the field of arson:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58324
These front-line action groups really aren’t helping your causes.
BTW, did anyone see GM’s pandering of hybrid technology when they awarded Mike Lowell the World Series MVP award? I guess they want to be viewed as “part of the global solution that includes private sector involvement, government leadership, and consumer response”. If it takes a lot of resources to produce the Prius’ hybrid drive’s battery, wouldn’t take even more resources to produce one for a hybrid Tahoe?
http://clubs.ccsu.edu/recorder/editorial/print_item.asp?NewsID=188
Yes, I know that the green blogosphere has started a major greenwashing campaign regarding the above story. However, it still has some merit if you understand anything about what is required in making a large, deep-cycle battery; not to mention processing all the additional copper for the electric motors.
November 19th, 2007 at 12:27 am
[...] Original place by Maria Surma Manka [...]
July 10th, 2008 at 2:13 pm
[...] Insurers Respond to Global Warming [...]