PROGRESS Act Could Move U.S. Towards Energy Security
The United States may take real steps towards a greater energy independence and a stronger economy with the Program for Real Energy Security, or PROGRESS Act. The bill – first introduced in the previous 109th Congress and reintroduced last week in the 110th - aims to jumpstart a massive national effort to diversify U.S. energy sources to include more renewable energy and implement energy-efficient and environmentally friendly technologies.
Authored by Congressman Steny H. Hoyer (D-MD) and co-authored by more than 100 House members (so far all Democrats), the PROGRESS Act is designed to complement the House Democrats’ Rural Working Group’s Biofuels Plan. Representative Hoyer explained:
“Fostering a safer, cleaner, and more prosperous America requires that we reduce our dependence on foreign oil. It is past due time to achieve real progress for America. I hope to work with my colleagues in the new Congress as well as with President Bush to pass this critical legislation and take action once and for all to achieve energy independence that strengthens our national security, boosts our economy, creates more jobs, and protects our environment for future generations.”
The PROGRESS Act includes five major proposals:
- Establish a National Energy Security Commission that would bring together government, industry and academic leaders to develop national goals and recommendations that Congress would have to act upon under expedited rules.
- Establish a National Biofuels Infrastructure Development Program that would include development of retail pumps, tanks, etc for biofuels.
- Promote Transit Use & Develop a Rail Infrastructure Program that would create a stimulus package to promote public transit and upgrades to the freight rail system to get an affordable and reliable supply of biofuels to market.
- Ensure Federal Government Leadership in the Use of the Alternatives to Oil by increasing the use of alternative fuels in federal and state fleets, developing biofuel plants in every region of the country, and speeding development of biofuels standards to promote use.
- Establish a New Manhattan Center for High Efficiency Vehicles to develop and promote technologies to double the average vehicle efficiency, diversify fuels, and continue to develop fuel cells and hydrogen.
All of the proposals appear to be a strong step forward, although it’s unfortunate that the last one is named “the New Manhattan Center.” Alluding to the development of the atomic bomb doesn’t really inspire me as much as, say, “the New Apollo Center” would. And it’s ironic that Toyota – a Japanese automaker – blazed the trail for efficient hybrid vehicles, and we’re now trying to surpass them with a program name connected with their nation's destruction!
Although the bill failed in last year's Congress, Rep. Hoyer is hopeful that it will get to the House floor this year with such strong support.


March 13th, 2007 at 2:08 am
Is there anything in this bill that would cause major controversy? Why was it killed the first time around?
March 13th, 2007 at 3:10 am
I couldn't find a record of any Republicans coming out against last year's bill, but they did have their own energy plan that included coal and drilling for oil in Alaska. It sems to be just old-fashioned politics - the Republicans were in control, they had different priorities, and wanted their plan to go through instead of the Democrats'.
October 16th, 2007 at 11:38 pm
I think that alot more should be done on a conservation and environmental front to reduce oil use and consumption and set our country on a path towards independance. I believe that congress and the senate should contact NRDC and other environmental organizations to look at creative ways to set our country towards the path of energy independance.